Simply put, I was rear ended in an accident. I was for “cutting in the way quoted uncertain.” I was not familiar with the law on auto accident rear end. I thought he was guilty not to have enough space and thought it was the only city. So I went to court and plead not guilty to put the quote, then I myself with the city attorney and dismissed the summons. I thought all was well and good, so I contacted the insurance of other parties to inform that I had my ticket dismissed and felt that their driver was to blame for the accident and has to pay claims. They told me they had sent a letter to me, ironically on the same day as my court appearance and said that they denied me any compensation.
So now I have dismissed the ticket, and proved that I do not blame I want the insurance to pay. It seems that everyone I have just spoken said that I have just one option, and to sue in Small Claims Court.
Is this my only option …. I proved that I do not fault! I do not want for months for a trial in small claims court which will not wait to pay, I will then be returned to the court for attachment of a boy of 20 years, the seizure is the only way I’m going to see money. pulled apart from that, I’m driving a damaged car (perhaps not yet arrived) was once a month by a police officer who wants only to me, because my back to shoot, as such. If it happens that I find to drive to another vehicle. Everyone thinks that car accidents are due to wounds, and a lot of money …. I will only fix my car.
What are the options I now? Can I go after the insurance to other parties for not paying a legitimate claim of responsibility? Is it worth pursuing at this time lawyers?
Get your ticket dismissed does not prove that you did not at fault. simply means that you do not have to pay a fine of traffic. The insurance company will pay you just because you get a ticket dismissed.
As for the other driver a ticket? Since you’re not, I do not think so.
The insurance company had investigated and found that their drivers not at fault. They are full to do in their rights. Although they have a real investigation – they are on the mainland. And in most states, there would be no grounds for action against the other types of insurance to be in bad faith. Very few states recognize the third party in bad faith.
If you have been “cutting risk by” charging – that seems as if you pass another car and then changed lanes in front of it and keep it cutting the stopping distance. In any case, it is not clear from simple collision lacking behind you to believe it is.
If you collision coverage on your vehicle, then file a claim on this point. Your company will conduct its own investigation. If they agree with you that you are not responsible for this accident, then they will try to be reimbursed by the other company.